different style of teaching

different style of teaching

You can safely that people who got carried away by the first sentence of the – okay form is emptiness, emptiness is form, form is not other than emptiness, emptiness is not other than the form, you can kind of jokingly say that people who got carried away by the first stanza, not have enough patience and listen to the rest, so to speak, they became very popular in Nalanda and slowly slowly slowly went to Tibet. Really. Okay, this could be wrong, this is my thinking. Tibet, India, very popular, specially northern India, and Tibet. And now I think in the West. People who kind of missed the first sentence, sort of missed the first sentence and got carried away by emptiness is form they got really excited and somehow the lineage went to China and Japan. This is how I feel.

So the dispute, not really dispute, dispute is not the right word, the style I think is the word, the style of the teaching has become different and not only that, in fact they even have their own, what you call it, the commander in chief at their helm so to speak. Maitreya. Emptiness is form and Manjushri, form is emptiness. ?? we call it, the two, not this two, but at least Nagarjuna guys from the Manjushri ??.

Parting from the four attachments, Nepal June 2009
(->videos on youtube)